The Clari vs Gong comparison broke in December 2025, and most of the articles ranking for it have not caught up.
On December 3, 2025, Clari completed its merger with Salesloft, naming Steve Cox CEO of the combined company. Then, in September 2026, the combined company retired the dual branding entirely. Clari is now Salesloft: one brand, one roadmap, with "Clari" surviving as the name of exactly one product, Clari Forecast.
Gong went the opposite direction. It stayed independent, passed 5,000 customers, reported more than $500 million in annual recurring revenue in May 2026, and rebuilt its positioning around AI agents.
So when you compare Gong vs Clari in late 2026, you are really weighing two different bets: a merged revenue forecasting and pipeline management platform now sold inside Salesloft's revenue orchestration platform, against an independent conversation intelligence platform that calls itself a Revenue AI Operating System. We verified every claim below against vendor announcements, G2 data, and procurement research in October 2026, so your decision rests on current facts, not a pre-merger snapshot.
|
Quick Answer
|
Clari and Gong both sit in the revenue intelligence category, but they attack it from opposite ends. Clari starts with the forecast and works backward into pipeline discipline. Gong starts with the conversation and works forward into deal insight.
Zoom out, and the split is simple:
|
Factor |
Clari (Salesloft) |
Gong |
Edge |
|
Core focus |
Forecast governance and pipeline discipline |
Conversation intelligence and deal insights |
Depends on your bottleneck |
|
Forecasting depth |
Native strength: rollups, commit tracking, pipeline inspection |
Gong Forecast add-on, reported near $700 per user per year |
Clari |
|
Conversation intelligence |
Continues under Salesloft (formerly Wingman) |
Deep call recording, Smart Trackers, coaching dashboards |
Gong |
|
Sales engagement |
Salesloft Cadence and Groove built into the platform post-merger |
Gong Engage, priced as an add-on |
Clari (Salesloft) |
|
AI agents |
RevAI commentary, Copilot Ask AI |
15+ specialized agents on the Gong Revenue Graph |
Gong |
|
Ownership (October 2026) |
Operating as Salesloft after the December 2025 merger |
Independent, $500M+ ARR reported May 2026 |
Draw |
|
G2 rating |
4.6 out of 5 (5,580 reviews) |
4.7 out of 5 |
Gong, narrowly |
Two events this cycle redrew the comparison.
Clari announced the merger in August 2025 and completed it on December 3, 2025. The stated goal: build a "Predictive Revenue System" on more than 10 billion revenue interactions and 1 trillion data signals, combining Clari forecasting with Salesloft sales engagement.
The part most comparisons still miss came later. In September 2026, less than a year after closing, the company dropped the dual branding and now operates as Salesloft. Per the merger FAQ, Clari Forecast keeps the Clari name, while the former Wingman and Groove products (acquired in 2022 and 2023) and the rest of the technology continue under Salesloft.
Three practical consequences for buyers:
One external benchmark rated the two halves separately just before the brand change: Clari was named a Leader and Salesloft a Visionary in the first 2025 Gartner Magic Quadrant for Revenue Action Orchestration.
Gong stayed independent and scaled. In May 2026, the company reported ARR above $500 million with growth over 55% year over year, serving more than 5,000 companies including Google, Uber for Business, and Canva.
On product, 2026 brought two major releases. Mission Andromeda (February 25, 2026) pushed the platform into enablement with Gong Enable. Mission Big Dipper (June 24, 2026) added an agentic execution layer: specialized agents that monitor deals, route work, and draft follow-ups, all running on the Gong Revenue Graph, the data engine under the whole system.
One pricing change travels with this: Gong rolled out metered AI credits in mid-2026, so heavy agent usage can add variable cost on top of seat licenses. Numbers in the pricing section below.
Clari is built as a revenue forecasting and pipeline management platform designed to give leadership predictable revenue visibility. Since September 2026, it ships as Clari Forecast inside the Salesloft platform, but the job has not changed: make the forecast more reliable.
It does this by pulling pipeline data from your CRM (typically Salesforce), layering AI-based risk scoring on top, and giving RevOps leaders and executives a structured view of:
Clari shines where forecast calls are high-stakes, multiple approval layers exist, and a RevOps team plays a central governance role. The forecast the CRO presents, and the pipeline the sales rep works with, come from the same rollup. In other words, Clari is built less to help reps sell and more to help leadership trust the number.
If Clari starts with the forecast, Gong starts with the conversation. Gong is a conversation intelligence platform that grew into what it now markets as a Revenue AI Operating System. It records calls, transcribes them, and runs AI analysis on what was said, then turns that data into coaching insights, deal risk signals, and forecasts.
Instead of asking "is this deal committed?", Gong asks "what did the buyer actually say?" The platform focuses on:
Everything runs on Gong's Revenue Graph, and since 2026 the Gong AI layer sits on top of it: a growing set of AI agents plus the Gong Assistant, covering deal review prep, account research, and ask-anything search across every conversation. Teams that use Gong daily tend to live in that layer more than the dashboards.
Clari and Gong are not direct twins competing for the same job. One governs the forecast, the other dissects the conversation. But the overlap grows every year, and for revenue leaders deciding where the budget goes, five areas decide it.
Clari was built for forecasting discipline, and it still leans stronger here. You get forecast categories, commit tracking, scenario rollups, and inspection workflows that CROs run their Monday calls on.
Gong Forecast approaches accuracy from a different angle: it layers conversation signals onto the data in your CRM, flagging deals where the calls contradict the stage. That catches risks a pure CRM model misses, but the forecasting workflows themselves are younger and sold as a separately priced add-on.
On accuracy claims, be careful with vendor math. A Forrester Total Economic Impact study commissioned by Clari in September 2025 modeled 33% more forecasting efficiency and 50% time saved on administration for a composite organization. Those are vendor-commissioned projections, not audited results. The structural comparison is the honest one: Clari models your CRM history and rollups natively; Gong infers risk from what buyers say. If the question is "can we trust the number?", Clari leans stronger. If the question is "which committed deals are secretly dead?", Gong adds signal.
This is Gong territory. Few tools in the category analyze calls at Gong's depth: it tracks objections and competitor mentions, measures talk-to-listen ratios, and surfaces patterns across thousands of sales calls. Managers get coaching dashboards; reps get searchable call libraries.
Clari Copilot, which began life as Wingman before Clari acquired it in 2022, covers call recording, summaries, battlecards, and activity capture. It has improved steadily, and in August 2026 added multi-call Ask AI and cross-call theme analysis. It now continues under the Salesloft brand alongside Salesloft Conversations.
For conversation intelligence and rep coaching depth, Gong still goes further. For teams that mainly need calls captured and fed into the forecast, it does the job at a lower reported price point.
Both tools depend heavily on Salesforce. Clari pulls structured pipeline data and enforces forecast hygiene. Gong syncs calls and insights back into deal records. Neither replaces your CRM; they sit on top of it through APIs.
This exposes the shared weakness: both are only as good as the CRM data they receive. If half your reps' emails and meetings never reach Salesforce, Clari forecasts on partial data and Gong analyzes calls detached from incomplete records. Neither tool syncs email and calendar activity into Salesforce at the inbox level; that layer has to come from somewhere else.
The merger moved this category. Clari buyers now get Salesloft Cadence and Groove sequences as part of the same platform conversation, which is exactly the ground Gong Engage and Outreach fight over. Gong Engage remains a separately priced module for outbound sequencing.
What neither platform fully solves, even in 2026:
That gap matters once a revenue team wants operational automation rather than another analytics dashboard.
Both are enterprise-grade deployments. Expect weeks of rollout, dedicated RevOps ownership, tracker or forecast model tuning, and real change management. Clari implementations depend on clean Salesforce stages and close dates before the forecast means anything. Gong implementations stall when reps feel surveilled and adoption slips.
Add one 2026-specific caveat for Clari: you are buying into an active post-merger integration. Salesloft has committed to transparency on the roadmap, but a platform mid-consolidation carries more packaging and priority risk than a standalone product. Price that into your contract length.
Start with the uncomfortable truth: neither vendor publishes pricing. Everything below comes from third-party procurement research and buyer-reported figures, current as of October 2026. Treat it as negotiation context, not list prices, and confirm quotes directly with the vendors.
Procurement research from Docket and Costbench (both verified their figures in 2026) reports that Clari pricing follows a modular structure:
|
Module |
Reported range |
Notes |
|
Clari Forecast (core) |
~$100 to $120 per user/month |
Billed annually; forecasting and pipeline inspection |
|
Clari Copilot add-on |
~$60 to $110 per user/month |
Conversation intelligence layer |
|
Groove (engagement) |
~$50 to $80 per user/month |
Sequences and workflows; Salesloft integration ongoing |
|
Full platform |
~$200 to $310+ per user/month |
All modules combined |
|
Contract minimum |
~$25,000 per year (reported) |
Bundling modules helps smaller teams reach it |
Two post-merger notes: Salesloft's FAQ states existing contracts, pricing, and renewal dates are unaffected by the merger, and the company markets the platform as having no extra platform fees. At renewal, ask which engagement product (Groove or Salesloft Cadence) gets long-term investment and whether bundle incentives exist for the combined stack.
Gong pricing has three mandatory layers, consistently reported across Docket, Sybill, and Vendr-sourced trackers in 2026:
|
Cost layer |
Reported range |
Notes |
|
Foundation license |
~$1,300 to $1,600 per user/year |
Call recording and analysis core |
|
Platform fee (mandatory) |
$5,000 to $50,000 per year |
Scales with team size; charged before any licenses |
|
Gong Forecast add-on |
~$700 per user/year |
Forecasting module, priced separately |
|
Gong Engage add-on |
~$800 per user/year |
Outbound sequencing module |
|
Full bundle |
~$2,400 to $3,000 per user/year |
Foundation + Engage + Forecast |
|
Onboarding |
~$7,500+ one time |
Implementation and training |
|
AI credits (new, mid-2026) |
Metered |
Heavy agent and AI workflow usage billed beyond seat allocations |
That mandatory fee is the line that surprises buyers. For a 10-person team, a $5,000 fee adds $500 per user per year before a single license. Procurement trackers also report Gong's effective per-user cost rose 25 to 56% between 2023 and 2026 after a March 2025 restructuring pushed bundled packages.
Review data settles some arguments the feature lists cannot. Here is the head-to-head from G2's Clari vs Gong comparison, pulled October 7, 2026:
|
G2 criterion |
Clari |
Gong |
|
Overall rating |
4.6 out of 5 (5,580 reviews) |
4.7 out of 5 |
|
Meets Requirements |
9.0 (4,144 reviews) |
9.4 (5,103 reviews) |
|
Ease of Use |
9.0 (4,214 reviews) |
9.3 (5,165 reviews) |
|
Ease of Setup |
8.6 (863 reviews) |
9.1 (1,362 reviews) |
|
Mid-market share of reviews |
47.1% |
69.4% |
Three patterns worth reading into the numbers:
If you compare Gong vs Clari purely on reviewer satisfaction, Gong wins narrowly. If you filter for enterprise forecasting specifically, Clari holds its ground on the job it was built for.
Neither platform is better in the abstract. The best revenue intelligence tool for your team follows from your constraint, so start there.
Choose Clari (Salesloft) when:
Choose Gong when:
Run both only if you can justify two overlapping deal-level views at renewal. Plenty of enterprises do exactly that, pairing Clari for forecasting with Gong for conversation intelligence, and a native integration exists. Just price the overlap honestly.
Look outside both when the real problem is the CRM data underneath. If activity capture is broken, no intelligence layer fixes it. That is also the moment to scan the wider market: our teardowns of best Clari alternatives, sales forecasting tools, and Gong vs Salesloft cover the adjacent options.
Clari governs the forecast. Gong analyzes the conversation. Both sit on top of Salesforce and inherit whatever data quality they find there.
Cirrus Insight positions itself underneath that problem. Instead of adding another analytics layer, it operates inside the workflow your team already uses: the inbox, the calendar, and Salesforce itself. Every capability below is a published, per-user monthly price from our pricing page, verified October 7, 2026.
Whether you run Salesforce or HubSpot decides this one: Cirrus Insight connects natively to Salesforce and nothing else, so HubSpot teams should look elsewhere. And it will not replace Clari's board-level forecast rollups for a 500-rep enterprise. What it fixes is the layer underneath: the activity data in Salesforce that every forecasting tool and conversation intelligence tool depends on.
Most platforms specialize in one phase. Clari reads the pipeline after activity lands in the CRM. Gong analyzes the call after it is recorded. Cirrus Insight spans the full revenue cycle:
If you are weighing Gong specifically, our Cirrus Insight vs Gong comparison breaks down the head-to-head in detail.
|
"What I like best about Cirrus Insight is how seamlessly it brings Salesforce into the tools people are already using, like Gmail and Outlook. Instead of switching back and forth between applications, you can manage leads, track emails, schedule meetings, and update records right from your inbox. That not only saves time but also helps sales teams focus on relationships instead of admin work. I also appreciate the visibility it gives managers through tracking and analytics. It bridges the gap between sales activity and CRM data in a really intuitive way." Paul Bankole, Assistant Professor, Anderson University |
|
See What Clean Salesforce Data Does for Your Forecast Thirty minutes with an advisor, using your own pipeline. No hidden fees, no annual minimum, published pricing. |
Clari focuses on forecast accuracy and pipeline governance, giving leadership structured rollups and forecast accuracy. Gong specializes in call analysis, turning sales conversations into coaching insights and deal risk signals. Since December 2025, Clari has been part of Salesloft, which added sales engagement to its side of the comparison.
It depends on your primary revenue constraint. If forecasting accuracy and pipeline inspection top the list, Clari is typically the better fit. If analyzing sales conversations and coaching reps matters more, Gong is stronger, and G2 reviewers rate it slightly higher overall (4.7 versus 4.6 as of October 2026).
No. Clari and Salesloft completed their merger on December 3, 2025, and in September 2026 the combined company adopted Salesloft as its single brand. Clari Forecast keeps the Clari name, and the broader Clari technology continues inside the Salesloft platform. Salesloft states that existing contracts and workflows are not immediately affected.
Yes, through Gong Forecast, a separately priced module (reported near $700 per user per year) that layers conversation signals onto pipeline data. It is strong at flagging at-risk deals, but Clari offers more structured forecast rollups, commit tracking, and governance for enterprise revenue teams.
Yes. Clari Copilot, originally Wingman (acquired in 2022), records and analyzes calls, surfaces buyer signals, and syncs next steps to the CRM. It now continues under the Salesloft brand. Gong still provides deeper call analysis, trackers, and coaching dashboards.
Clari builds its forecast from CRM history, stage data, and rollup discipline, which suits top-down accuracy. Gong Forecast infers deal health from what buyers say on calls, which catches risks the CRM misses. Teams serious about both often pair them, at a real overlap cost.
Chorus is the third name buyers raise. ZoomInfo acquired Chorus in 2021, and it now sells as conversation intelligence software inside ZoomInfo's go-to-market platform, which makes it most attractive to existing ZoomInfo customers. Against Gong it competes on price rather than depth. Our Gong vs Chorus comparison covers that matchup in full.
Yes, and many enterprises do: Clari for the forecast, Gong for conversation intelligence, connected through a native integration that displays open opportunity data alongside calls. The trade-off is paying twice for overlapping deal views, which is exactly the line-item procurement challenges at renewal.
Yes, by design. Reported 2026 figures put a full Gong bundle at $2,400 to $3,000 per user per year plus a mandatory $5,000 to $50,000 platform fee, and the combined Clari platform at $200 to $310+ per user per month with a reported $25,000 annual minimum. Both target mid-market and enterprise budgets and require annual contracts.
Both integrate deeply with Salesforce and both depend on accurate CRM data to work. Neither captures email and calendar activity at the inbox level, so Salesforce-native tools like Cirrus Insight often run underneath either platform to keep the data in Salesforce complete.
Cirrus Insight is the main Salesforce-native alternative to Gong and Clari: automatic email and calendar sync, AI meeting summaries on deal records, buyer signals, scheduling, and live coaching, all priced per module with published rates from $5 per user per month. It improves execution and data quality rather than replacing enterprise forecast governance.
For some teams, parts of both; for most, it plays a different position. Cirrus Insight fixes CRM automation, meeting intelligence, and activity capture inside Salesforce. A 500-rep org with board-level forecast requirements still needs a dedicated forecasting layer. A mid-market sales team drowning in manual data entry often gets more lift from fixing the inputs first.