Microsoft went and measured what a normal workday actually looks like. People working in Microsoft 365 get interrupted every two minutes. Up to 275 times a day, from meetings, emails, and notifications, across a survey of 31,000 workers in 31 countries (Microsoft Work Trend Index, 2025). Meetings are the loudest of those interruptions and the only ones you cannot skim.
I spent three weeks on this update: reading every vendor pricing page line by line, checking feature claims against product documentation, and cutting the tools whose homepage promised more than the product delivered. I have not personally run all fourteen through a quarter of live calls, and where I leaned on published documentation or independent testing instead of my own, I say so in the entry.
Here are the fourteen that earned a place.
|
Keep the notes. Lose the admin. Cirrus Insight syncs every meeting, email, and task to Salesforce automatically. Start a free trial, no credit card required. |
An AI meeting assistant is software that records, transcribes, summarizes, and analyzes your meetings automatically, across platforms like Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet. It does not replace your video conferencing tool.
Three things every tool in this category does:
Past that shared floor, the category splits four ways. Every entry below is tagged with one of these, and the split matters more than the feature lists do. Pick the wrong sub-type and no amount of accuracy saves you. If you want the deeper version of this, we wrote a full guide to conversational intelligence for sales teams.
|
About this roundup This article is published by Cirrus Insight, and Cirrus Insight is one of the fourteen tools on the list. Every tool here, ours included, is graded against the same five criteria below and carries real cons. We looked at more than thirty tools to get to fourteen. Nobody paid for placement, there are no affiliate links on this page, and where a competitor beats us at something, we say which one and at what. If you are in a Google Workspace shop with no CRM, several tools below will serve you better than we will. |
Here is what I graded every tool on, in the order that matters:
|
Tool |
Best for |
Standout feature |
Starting price |
Website |
|
Cirrus Insight |
Salesforce-first sales teams |
Meeting AI briefing before every call and in call live coaching |
From $14 or $21/user/mo; free trial |
|
|
Fireflies.ai |
A searchable team archive |
AskFred across your whole archive |
Free; paid from $10/user/mo annual |
|
|
Granola |
Combining your own notes with AI |
Enriches the notes you type yourself |
Free; Business from $14/user/mo |
|
|
Otter |
Asking questions about past meetings |
Account-wide AI Chat search |
Free 300 min/mo; from $8.33/user/mo annual |
|
|
Avoma |
Conversation analytics and coaching |
Talk-to-listen ratio and deal risk |
From $19/recorder/mo annual |
|
|
Read AI |
Search across meetings, email, and chat |
Search Copilot across every surface |
Free 5 meetings/mo; Pro from $15/user/mo annual |
|
|
Krisp |
Noisy rooms and accent clarity |
Noise cancellation plus accent conversion |
7-day trial; Core from $8/user/mo annual |
|
|
MeetGeek |
Automated post-meeting distribution |
Auto follow-ups into Slack and email |
Free 3 hrs; paid from $9.99/user/mo |
|
|
Sembly AI |
Tracking topics across recurring meetings |
Cross-meeting topic dashboards |
Free basic; Pro from $10/mo |
|
|
Supernormal |
Shareable, well-formatted notes |
Structured recaps into Docs and Notion |
Free tier; paid from $22/user/mo |
|
|
tl;dv |
Timestamped highlights from long calls |
Share the 40 seconds that matter |
Free; paid from $18/user/mo annual |
|
|
Jamie |
Summaries without handing over your audio |
Calendar permission only, no audio access |
From $25/user/mo |
|
|
Notta.ai |
Multilingual and global teams |
Transcription in 100+ languages |
Free plan; Pro from $13.99/mo |
|
|
Fathom |
A genuinely free option |
Unlimited free recordings and summaries |
Free; paid from $15/user/mo annual |
Category: CRM-connected sales meeting assistant
Every other tool on this list treats the meeting as the destination. Cirrus Insight treats it as the input. That is the whole difference, and it is why it sits in a different sub-type from Fireflies.ai or Otter.ai even though all three will hand you a transcript.
If your team lives in Salesforce, this is the closest thing here to a digital SDR working behind the scenes. Meeting AI does the prospect research for you and drops the briefing in your inbox the morning of the call: who you are meeting, what the company has been doing, what the opportunity looks like, what you last talked about.
Conversation Intelligence records and transcribes the call itself, tags the key moments, and produces coaching-ready summaries. Then everything lands in Salesforce automatically. Meetings, emails, tasks, call data, with zero manual entry.
The piece that gets underrated is Buyer Signals, which tracks opens, clicks, and replies between meetings. Most assistants go quiet the moment the call ends. Cirrus Insight works before, during and after the meeting to ensure reps are conducting their best meetings every time. This is a Salesforce sales tool. If you are running engineering standups or an all-hands, Fathom or Granola will serve you better and cost you less. If your CRM is HubSpot, Avoma's native integration is deeper. And if you are not in a CRM at all, none of this machinery earns its keep. Where it does earn it, the payback is admin time: we wrote up the full workflow in our guide to automating sales meeting prep in Salesforce.
Cirrus Insight pros:
Cirrus Insight cons:
Cirrus Insight pricing: Starts at $7/ user/ month a la carte feature pricing and flexible billing options. . Free trial, no credit card required. Meeting transcription and live coaching are pricing based on hours of use.
Category: Bot-based AI notetaker
When your team runs dozens of meetings a week, the problem stops being capture and starts being retrieval. Fireflies.ai is built for that second problem. It transcribes with reported accuracy above 90%, assigns speech to the right speaker once you have identified who is who, and then makes the whole archive searchable.
AskFred is the reason to pick it. Ask a question, and it answers across your meetings rather than one of them, which is the same trick Otter.ai's AI Chat pulls and roughly where the two tools collide. Where Fireflies pulls ahead is the sorting: it isolates dates, metrics, tasks, and questions from the transcript so you can filter on them later, runs sentiment analysis across the call, and tracks topics you define yourself.
It also gives you a per-speaker breakdown with words-per-minute and share of talk time, which is a lighter version of what Avoma does properly.
Sharing is where it fits a team rather than a person. Clip a moment into a soundbite and send it. Teammates comment on the meeting page. If you run an internal knowledge base, you can embed meetings or soundbites into it, which is the closest anything here gets to a single source of truth for what was actually said.
Native integrations cover the ones that matter: Salesforce and HubSpot for lead data, Slack for the team, Asana for the follow-ups. The interface is the trade-off. Some screens carry more than they should, and the topic tracking does nothing until you have set it up.
Fireflies.ai pros:
Fireflies.ai cons:
Fireflies.ai pricing: Free plan with unlimited transcription and 800 minutes of storage; paid plans from $10/user/month billed annually.
Category: Bot-free meeting notepad
Granola is the only tool here built on the assumption that you still want to take notes yourself. Everything else on this list is trying to make note-taking unnecessary. As your ai meeting notetaker, Granola is trying to make your notes better.
It works as a live notepad. You jot a rough agenda or a few fragments during the call, and afterwards Granola plugs the relevant detail from the transcript into what you wrote. The result reads like you wrote it, because you did, but with the numbers and names filled in. If you are the kind of person who thinks by typing, this is the one.
The second thing it does differently: no bot. Granola captures audio from your device rather than joining the meeting, so nobody sees a recording participant appear. Krisp and Jamie share that architecture, and it is the single biggest reason to pick any of the three, particularly in client calls and candidate interviews where a bot in the room changes the temperature. Granola transcribes in real time and then deletes the audio, keeping only the transcript.
On the Business plan it connects to Notion, HubSpot, Slack, and Zapier, and gives you unlimited history plus shared team folders. What it will not do is record video. If you need to rewatch the call rather than reread it, tl;dv or Fathom is your tool, not this one. The iOS app added phone transcription in 2026, but only for calls you place, not calls you receive.
Granola pros:
Granola cons:
Granola pricing: Free Basic plan; Business from $14/user/month with integrations and team folders; Enterprise from $35/user/month with SSO.
Category: Bot-based AI notetaker
Otter.ai is the name most people in this category already know, and the live transcription and speaker identification are as good as the reputation suggests. But the reason it is on this list in 2026 is AI Chat, and the old version of this article buried it in the third bullet.
Ask AI Chat whether you were mentioned in a meeting, and it comes back with the action items assigned to you. That is a small feature with a large payoff: if you had to drop off a call, or missed it entirely because something else was on fire, you can still find out what landed on your plate without watching an hour of video. Click AI Chat from the left-hand menu instead of inside a meeting, and it searches your whole account, so you can ask what was decided about a topic across every call rather than one.
The workspace layer makes it work for a team. Channels, mentions, task assignment, and a Slack integration if your team lives there instead. Fireflies.ai does the same job with AskFred and better archive filtering; Otter.ai's version is more chat-driven and feels closer to using ChatGPT, which some people prefer and some find imprecise.
It also transcribes uploaded audio and video, which is useful and unglamorous. The weak spot is technical vocabulary. If your calls are full of product codenames or specialist terms, expect to correct the transcript, and check a sample before you commit the team.
Otter.ai pros:
Otter.ai cons:
Otter.ai pricing: Free plan up to 300 minutes/month; paid plans from $8.33/user/month billed annually ($16.99/month billed monthly).
Category: Meeting intelligence platform
Having every meeting transcribed is one thing. Knowing what the transcripts say about how your team sells is another. Avoma is the tool on this list that goes furthest into the second question, and it is the closest competitor to Cirrus Insight on use case, which is worth saying on Cirrus Insight's own blog.
The analytics are specific rather than decorative. It tracks filler words, so you can find the reps saying "um" every fourth word. It tracks monologues, so you can see exactly where a conversation stopped being a conversation. It tracks talk-to-listen ratio, which is the single most predictive coaching metric in a discovery call. And it runs competitive tracking: every time a customer mentions a competitor, Avoma logs it and correlates it against whether you won or lost, which is a genuinely useful thing to know and almost nobody else here does it.
On top of that sit topic tracking, deal risk surfacing, and AI scoring for coaching new reps. Native integrations cover Salesforce, HubSpot, Copper, and Pipedrive, so if you are a HubSpot shop this is deeper than what Cirrus Insight offers you. We compared the field properly in our roundup of conversation intelligence tools for CRM sales.
Two caveats. It is the most expensive entry point on this list, and it is billed per recorder rather than per user, which reliably confuses procurement. More importantly, all this depth is wasted if nobody on your team is being coached. If you just want good notes, this is an expensive way to get them.
Avoma pros:
Avoma cons:
Avoma pricing: From $19/recorder/month billed annually.
Category: Meeting intelligence platform
Every other tool here indexes your meetings. Read AI indexes your meetings, your email, your messages, your CRM, and your files, and then lets you search all of it at once with Search Copilot. That is the entire pitch, and it is a real one, because the thing you are usually looking for is not in the meeting. It is in the thread that followed it.
The bot joins the call, produces the notes, the summary, and the action items, and adds engagement scoring on top. That last part puts it in the same sub-type as Avoma and Sembly AI, though it goes broader and shallower than Avoma does: you get sentiment and engagement across the meeting rather than per-rep coaching metrics.
Live captures are unlimited on every paid plan, which is more generous than it first looks. What is capped is uploads. Importing your own recordings costs credits (100 minutes a month on Pro, 200 on Enterprise, 300 on Enterprise+), they reset monthly, and they do not roll over. Video playback is not on Pro at all; it starts at the Enterprise tier, which is a meaningful jump for a feature Fathom gives away.
The thing to know before you roll it out: the Read Assistant bot joins meetings from your calendar automatically once enabled, whether or not you actually attend them. That has generated a steady stream of complaints, and it is a settings problem rather than a bug, but it is the kind of settings problem that shows up in a client's meeting as an uninvited participant. Change the default on day one.
Read AI pros:
Read AI cons:
Read AI pricing: Free plan with 5 meetings/month; Pro from $19.75/user/month ($15 billed annually); Enterprise $29.75/user/month; Enterprise+ $39.75/user/month with HIPAA and SSO.
Category: Bot-free meeting notepad
Krisp starts from a different place than everything else here. It began as noise cancellation and grew into a meeting assistant, which means it fixes the audio before it transcribes it. That order matters more than it sounds: a transcript is only as good as what the microphone picked up, and half the transcription complaints in this category are really microphone complaints.
It sits at the audio layer on your device rather than joining the call, so it works with any conferencing app: Zoom today, Teams tomorrow, Slack Huddles in between, plus in-person meetings through the mobile app. No bot appears, which puts it alongside Granola and Jamie. If you want a bot for consent reasons on Zoom, there is an option for that too, which is a more thoughtful answer than either extreme.
The noise cancellation works in both directions, so you can strip the dog barking on the other person's side as well as your own. Accent conversion is the feature nothing else on this list has: real-time conversion on the speaker side (Indian, Filipino, South African, and Latam accents supported) and unlimited on the listener side. Krisp reports 96% transcription accuracy across 16+ languages, with English handled on-device and fifteen more server-side. There is a Transcript Only mode if you want the notes without a recording existing at all, and an MCP integration for Claude, ChatGPT, and Cursor.
The pricing is where it gets awkward. There is no free plan, only a 7-day trial, which makes it the hardest tool here to evaluate properly before paying. Salesforce and ConnectWise integrations are gated to the Advanced tier, so Salesforce teams are looking at $15/user/month rather than $8. And signup wants a Google or Outlook calendar connection by default.
Krisp pros:
Krisp cons:
Krisp pricing: 7-day free trial; Core from $8/user/month billed annually ($16 monthly); Advanced from $15/user/month annually ($30 monthly); Enterprise custom, with SSO, HIPAA, and on-device private transcription.
Category: Bot-based AI notetaker
Most tools here stop at the summary and leave the sending to you. MeetGeek is built around the send. Searchable transcripts, key takeaways, and personalized summaries go out automatically into Slack or email, with the action items attached, without anyone deciding to do it. If your problem is not "we do not have notes" but "the notes never reach the people who needed them", this is the answer on this list.
It also gives you analytics on meeting efficiency and participation, which is lighter than what Avoma or Read AI produce but enough to spot the recurring meeting that should be an email.
The newer thing is AI voice agents, which talk back. You configure one from the Voice Agents screen the way you would build a custom GPT: give it a name and a set of instructions describing what it should do and cover. Templates exist for an AI recruiter that runs a structured interview, an AI SDR, and an AI Scrum Master that runs standups. It is genuinely novel in a category where bots have always listened silently.
Test it before you rely on it. The AI agents can be slow to start and behave unpredictably, especially when people interrupt or forget the activation phrase. And the free plan is thin: three hours of transcription, three months of transcript storage, one month of audio, and no agents at all. Published pricing also varies between sources, which is worth pinning down before you commit a team.
MeetGeek pros:
MeetGeek cons:
MeetGeek pricing: Free tier with 3 hours of transcription; paid plans from $9.99/user/month billed annually, with some sources quoting $15/user/month.
Category: Meeting intelligence platform
Sembly AI transcribes and summarizes with AI-generated action points, which is table stakes at this point. The reason it is here is the dashboard.
Most tools in this category think in meetings. Sembly thinks in threads. Its team dashboards track topics and recurring tasks across many meetings rather than inside one, so you can see that the same blocker has come up in four consecutive standups, or that a topic you thought was closed keeps resurfacing.
That is a different question from "what happened on Tuesday" and almost nothing else on this list answers it. Fireflies.ai comes closest with its topic tracking, but Fireflies makes you configure the topics; Sembly is built around the cross-meeting view from the start.
It works natively with Zoom, Google Meet, and Microsoft Teams, and the free basic plan is enough to test it against your own recurring meetings, which is the only test that matters for a tool like this.
The limits follow from the design. Coverage stops at the big three platforms, so if you are on Webex or GoTo Meeting, Fireflies.ai has you covered and this does not. And the cross-meeting dashboards only pay off if you genuinely run recurring meetings. For a stream of one-off calls, Fathom or Otter.ai gives you more for less.
Sembly AI pros:
Sembly AI cons:
Sembly AI pricing: Free basic plan; Pro from $10/month.
Category: Bot-based AI notetaker
Supernormal has the narrowest differentiator on this list, and it is a real one: the notes come out looking finished. It captures video meetings automatically and produces structured summaries within seconds, formatted well enough to forward without touching them.
That sounds cosmetic until you have watched someone spend fifteen minutes reformatting an AI summary before sending it to a client. Native integrations with Google Docs and Notion mean the recap lands where your team already writes, editable, rather than trapped in another tool's interface. AI-generated recaps go out immediately after the call.
Where it does not compete is depth. There is no CRM layer in the class of Avoma or Cirrus Insight, no cross-meeting analytics like Sembly AI, no account-wide chat search like Otter.ai. And at $22/user/month it is priced above tools that do considerably more. If polished, shareable output is the specific thing you are buying, that price is defensible. If it is not, it is hard to justify against Fathom at zero.
Supernormal pros:
Supernormal cons:
Supernormal pricing: Free tier; paid plans from $22/user/month.
Category: Bot-based AI notetaker
The name is the product. tl;dv records and transcribes automatically and then does everything it can to stop you rewatching anything. Timestamped highlights let you tag a teammate and send the forty seconds that matter instead of the hour that contained them, which is the single most useful thing you can do with a long call.
The search is the strongest on this list. Under Meetings & Folders, the Ask tl;dv AI input takes prompts across many meetings at once, which is where it beats a per-meeting chat: ask it for a sales performance analysis or to detect where the team is misaligned and it works across the set. The Search tab filters go further than anyone else's. Beyond internal versus external or meetings you attended, you can pull meetings by deal stage in HubSpot or Salesforce, with five more filter types on top.
Scheduled AI reports tie it together. Pick the meetings with those filters, pick the prompt, pick the cadence, connect it to Slack or your CRM, and you get a daily action-item digest or a weekly list of open bugs without asking for it.
The bot can fail to join when tl;dv's servers are busy, which is a bad failure mode for the one call you needed recorded. And the search filters that make it special need a connected CRM to be worth much; without HubSpot or Salesforce behind it, you are paying for a good notetaker with a nice search box.
tl;dv pros:
tl;dv cons:
tl;dv pricing: Free version available; paid plans from $18/user/month billed annually ($25/month billed monthly).
Category: Bot-free meeting notepad
Jamie is the newest tool on this list and the most single-minded. It writes structured summaries of any meeting in under two minutes and does not try to do anything else.
The architecture is the interesting part. It works without access to your audio files, needing only calendar permission, which puts it in the bot-free sub-type alongside Granola and Krisp but by a different route. Granola captures your device audio, Krisp sits at the audio layer, and Jamie asks for less than either. For legal, healthcare, or any team where "where does the recording live" is a question with a compliance answer, that is a shorter conversation to have with your security reviewer.
It integrates cleanly with Google Workspace and Microsoft 365, which covers most people, and the summaries are structured well enough to act on without cleanup.
The cost of that focus is everything else. At $25/user/month it is the highest per-seat starting price here, above Supernormal and well above Fireflies.ai at $10. There is no analytics layer, no coaching, no cross-meeting dashboard, no CRM depth. The integration list is short next to Fireflies.ai or Read AI. You are paying a premium for fast, clean summaries and a small permission footprint, and if that is not precisely what you need, almost everything else here is a better deal.
Jamie pros:
Jamie cons:
Jamie pricing: From $25/user/month.
Category: Bot-based AI notetaker
Notta.ai transcribes across more than 100 languages. Nothing else on this list is close. Krisp handles 16 and calls it a strength, which it is; Notta handles six times that.
If your team spans Tokyo, São Paulo, and Warsaw, this is not a nice-to-have, it is the entire decision. Everything else here is fundamentally an English-language product that has added languages. Notta is built for the case where the meeting is not in English and neither is half the team.
Past that it does the expected work well: converts recordings and notes into shareable summaries or reports, and syncs with Google Calendar to auto-join and record without you remembering to start it.
Two things to weigh. The 100+ figure covers transcription; summary quality in the long tail of those languages is a different question and you should test the specific languages your team actually speaks before rolling it out. And calendar auto-join means it records by default, which is convenient right up until it is not. There is also no CRM depth here in the class of Avoma or Cirrus Insight, so it is a notes tool rather than a revenue tool.
Notta.ai pros:
Notta.ai cons:
Notta.ai pricing: Free plan; Pro from $13.99/month.
Category: Bot-based AI notetaker
Fathom gives away what most tools on this list charge for. Unlimited recordings and unlimited summaries on the free plan, for individuals, with no catch that I could find. Otter.ai stops you at 300 minutes a month. Read AI stops you at five meetings. Krisp gives you seven days. Fathom just keeps going.
The free tier covers the whole core of the category: automatic recording, summaries with timestamps and highlights, clips you can organize into playlists and share, and recaps pushed straight to your CRM or the right Slack channel. There is one small touch worth naming because it is the kind of thing you only appreciate after using it: content copied out of Fathom pastes in fully formatted, so you are not reformatting a summary before you send it. Supernormal charges $22/user/month largely for that.
Paid plans exist now and they are aimed at teams: a Team Calls tab, per-member meeting statistics that are useful for sales coaching, keyword alerts that fire when a term is mentioned, and automation to simplify the CRM connections.
There are known quirks when running it with Google Meet and Microsoft Teams rather than Zoom, keyword alerts and team statistics are paid-only, and there is no analytics depth here in the class of Avoma or Read AI. But if you are not sure an AI meeting assistant will help you at all, start here. It costs nothing to find out, which is not a sentence I can write about anything else on this list.
Fathom pros:
Fathom cons:
Fathom pricing: Free for individuals with unlimited recordings and summaries; paid plans from $15/user/month billed annually.
Maybe not. Worth saying out loud on a page that is trying to sell you fourteen options.
The major conferencing platforms have all built AI meeting features in. Zoom includes transcription, smart chapters, and summaries from its lowest paid plan. Microsoft Teams needs a Copilot add-on on top of an active Microsoft 365 Business subscription, but in exchange Copilot reads meeting context against the rest of your company data. Google Meet gates transcription behind its Gemini Enterprise plan and does not do much beyond it.
If you live in one platform, do not need conversation analytics, and are already paying for the plan that includes it, a separate subscription is a hard sell. Check what you already own before you buy anything on this list.
A dedicated assistant earns its price in three cases:
One related case: if you are already inside Salesforce, look at what Sales Cloud gives you natively before adding anything. We broke down Salesforce Einstein Conversation Insights in detail, and HubSpot shops should read our take on HubSpot Conversational Intelligence first.
Fourteen tools and not one of them wins outright, because the category does not have a winner. It has four shapes, and you are picking a shape before you pick a product.
Four questions decide it:
AI meeting assistants are good at their job. But capture is half the equation. The value shows up when insights turn into outcomes: next steps tracked, meetings converted to opportunities, customer data flowing into the CRM without anyone retyping it.
That is where Cirrus Insight picks up. Where an assistant captures what happened, Cirrus Insight moves what happens next:
Together, an AI meeting assistant and Cirrus Insight cover the whole workflow: before, during, and after every conversation. We shipped the current Conversation Intelligence release in December 2025 and it is what most of this article's product references point at. Book a 30-minute demo if you want to see it against your own pipeline.
An AI meeting assistant is software that records, transcribes, and summarizes meetings automatically. It captures the discussion, identifies action items, and shares summaries instantly, so nobody has to take notes while trying to listen. Most integrate with Zoom, Microsoft Teams, and Google Meet, and the better ones push the output into your CRM or task tool.
Two ways, and the difference matters. Bot-based tools join your meeting as a visible participant. Bot-free tools capture audio from your device instead, so nobody sees a recording bot appear. Either way, they use speech recognition and natural language processing to transcribe the dialogue, identify speakers, and generate summaries. Most also extract action items and sync notes to your other tools.
You stop choosing between listening and taking notes. Concretely: hours saved each week on transcription and documentation, clearer accountability because follow-ups are captured rather than remembered, and a searchable archive of every past discussion. Microsoft found that people in Microsoft 365 are interrupted every two minutes; anything that removes one job from a meeting is worth having.
There is no single best one, which is why this list runs to fourteen. The strongest options in 2026 are Cirrus Insight, Fireflies.ai, Granola, Otter.ai, Avoma, Read AI, Krisp, MeetGeek, Sembly AI, Supernormal, tl;dv, Jamie, Notta.ai, and Fathom. Pick by shape first: bot-free if a recording participant is a problem, CRM-connected if the meeting has to become a Salesforce record, meeting intelligence if you are coaching reps, and a straightforward notetaker if you just want good notes.
Free to about $40 per user per month. Fathom is free for individuals with unlimited recordings. Free tiers elsewhere are usually capped: Otter.ai at 300 minutes a month, Read AI at five meetings, MeetGeek at three hours. Paid plans cluster between $8 and $25 per user per month, with Krisp's annual Core plan at the bottom and Jamie at the top. Enterprise tiers with HIPAA, SSO, and admin controls run higher.
The reputable ones are, and they will tell you exactly how. Look for SOC 2 Type II and GDPR as a baseline, HIPAA if you need it, and read what each tool does with your data specifically. Krisp states it does not train its models on your meetings. Granola deletes the audio after transcription and gates organization-wide training opt-out to its Enterprise tier. Read the retention settings and the permission controls before you roll anything out, not after.
Most do. Salesforce and HubSpot are the common CRM targets, plus Slack, Asana, and Notion for tasks and docs. Depth varies more than the integration lists suggest. Avoma runs native Salesforce, HubSpot, Copper, and Pipedrive. Krisp gates Salesforce to its Advanced tier. Cirrus Insight goes furthest on Salesforce specifically because that is the entire premise of the product rather than a connector bolted on.